2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 6, 1990, the registration of transfer of ownership in the Plaintiff’s name was completed on March 6, 1990 with respect to two parcels, including 1441m2 and 1441m2 (H, 681m2, 1101m2, and 1101m2 as indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant land”). On October 17, 1990, the joint establishment registration was completed on October 17, 1990, for the debtor, the mortgagee, the J-mortgage, the maximum debt amount of 300,00

After April 22, 1993, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on April 21, 1993 in the Plaintiff, respectively, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed from July 24, 1991 to June 29, 192 in L and M as well as from June 24, 1991.

B. From May 1, 198 to March 31, 1994, the Plaintiff was engaged in the original volume processing business with the trade name “P” from Macheon-si N (Road Name AddressO).

K died on May 5, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased"), and now, K had the Defendants, who are his/her inheritors, as their children.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, and fact-finding with respect to Qin of this Court

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged that he had become aware of the deceased while processing business, etc. with the trade name of "P," and had the deceased live in the P factory, and had the auditor hold the position.

During that period, P is in danger of compulsory execution, such as making it difficult to P and completing the provisional attachment registration of LA on the land of this case, and the trust agreement with the deceased was made, and the registration of ownership transfer has been made in the future.

In addition, in order to prevent the deceased from arbitrarily disposing of the land of this case, the deceased had M&M make a provisional seizure on the land of this case.

In addition, R, a village resident, exercised his right as the owner by allowing R, a village resident, to cultivate the land of this case.

As such, the Plaintiff made a title trust on the land of this case to the deceased, but the registration of ownership in the deceased’s name is registered.