상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is only the victim's verbal dispute with the victim, and there is no injury to the victim by opening the door so that the victim may not have any defect that the victim would have opened and attempt to do so as to do so as to do so as to do so as to do so.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's legitimately adopted and examined evidence on the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts, namely, the victim stated that when the victim intends to get out of the vehicle consistently from the investigative process to the court of the court below, the victim suffered bodily injury between the door of the vehicle and the vehicle, the victim's contact address at the time of the occurrence of the case, and the victim's contact address was sent to the victim. If the defendant did not inflict bodily injury on the victim, there is no reason to give his/her contact address to the victim, and other injury diagnosis reports against the victim, it is acknowledged that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim as shown in the facts charged in the case.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.