체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. (1) On March 11, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a non-Visa for 30 days from April 10, 2015 to July 12, 2016, and filed an application for refugee status on July 12, 2016, and filed a stay permit until January 12, 2017 with the status of stay as G-1-5 (Refugee applicant) of August 8, 2016, but decided not to grant refugee status on September 1, 2016.
She filed an objection against the decision not to recognize refugee status, and applied again on January 12, 2017 G-1-5 (Applicant for Refugee Recognition) for the extension of the period of stay.
On January 20, 2017, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition denying the extension of sojourn period, etc. on the ground that the Plaintiff constitutes an abused refugee applicant who failed to meet the requirements of G-1-5 (Refugee Recognition Applicants).
[Judgment of the court below] Facts without dispute, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. If a foreigner staying in the Republic of Korea intends to engage in an activity that differs from his/her sojourn status, he/she shall obtain a permit to change his/her sojourn status in advance (Article 24(1) of the Immigration Control Act), and if a foreigner intends to continue his/her sojourn in excess of his/her sojourn period, he/she
Article 25 of the Immigration Control Act (Article 25 of the Immigration Control Act). The plaintiff is comprised of the population ratio of 1.4% of the Kazak Kazak 63.6%, Rusccck 23.3%, Maccccck 2.9%, Mackn 2.0%, Mackra 1.4%, Matar 1.2%, 1.1%, 1.1%, and 1.5% of other ethnic groups, and the introduction of capitalism as well as the protection of the socially weak. The plaintiff is a minority belonging to the Mack System, and it is inevitable for the plaintiff to avoid such damage as above.