However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

1. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant interfered with his/her business: (a) was on board the 6-site area of the scenic village located at 90,00,00 Scam, from May 31, 2018; (b) was on board the back seat of the taxi operated by the victim C, and was on board the passenger, and without responding to the victim’s accurate destination, the Defendant “welling, chewing,” without responding to the victim’s correct destination; (c) yeast, yeast, yeast, or mari;

Around 10 minutes, a victim interfered with the victim's taxi business by force over about 10 minutes by opening a taxi back and leaving one to outside the taxi, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) requested the Defendant to guide the procedures for filing a complaint against the taxi engineer by E and F, a policeman belonging to the police box of the Pakistan, who was dispatched to the scene upon receipt of the report of 112, and returned home to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant stated that “I Y, E, and F, a police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the police box of the Pakistan, will be able to return home to the taxi engineer; (c) I am fried to “I Y, E, E, a bit of bit of bitch bitch, this bitch of bitch,” and the above F, “I am f, this bitch, if I f will not have any bit of bitch, bitch, bitch, etc., and interfere with the performance of his duties by assaulting police officers with the handling of the report of this case by doing so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to E, F, and C;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Type 1 of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code applies to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the suspended sentence, crimes (Interference with the execution of official duties) / [the scope of recommended punishment] interference with the execution of official duties.