The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The lower court determined that Article 6(5) of the Minimum Wage Act does not violate the principle of equality under the Constitution, while Article 6(5) of the Minimum Wage Act does not recognize the obligation to pay the rent claimed by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant solely on the basis of the agreement on wages and the continuous service allowances and bonuses in this case are included in the comparative wage of the minimum wage.

Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the “minimum wage”, “working hours”, and “minimum wage” under Article 6(5) of the Minimum Wage Act, and wage agreements and collective agreements, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.