특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or equivalent circumstances) and violation of Road Traffic Act (or measures not taken after an accident);
A. The first accident Defendant is a person engaged in driving a car BK5 vehicle.
On August 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on August 23:10, 2017, and led the two-lanes of the two-lanes near the Gan-ro in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon to the parallel of the two-lanes, depending on one lane.
Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely by checking the traffic situation in front.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to stop at the front of the passenger car, and received the back portion of the Drocketing passenger car driven by the victim C (56) who stops at the front of the signal signal.
Defendant 1 caused injury to the victim C of a traffic accident due to the foregoing negligence in the course of performing his duties, such as brain dead in the head requiring medical treatment for about 20 days, and tensions and tensions with the bones of necks, etc.; at the same time, Defendant 1 destroyed the said rocketing car to take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle and providing relief to the victim C, without any necessary measures.
B. The Defendant continued to operate the second accident as a business of the B K5 car at the above time, and continued to drive the F Hospital in front of the F Hospital in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon along one lane, from the side of the two four streets to the NN distance.
Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely by checking the traffic situation in front.
Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in driving the HM3 car driving by the victim G(44 tax) who stops in the front line with a signal signal.