beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.05 2017가단142605

중개보수금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. ① The Plaintiff is a licensed real estate agent who runs the real estate brokerage business under the trade name of Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City building and 130 "D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office", ② E is a brokerage assistant for the Plaintiff, ③ the Defendant is a member of the F church, ④ G is the head of the International Association in Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the real estate agent who runs the real estate brokerage business under the trade name of 118 "K Licensed Real Estate Agent Office" in Seoul Special Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, is a licensed real estate agent who runs the real estate brokerage business under the trade name of 118 "K Licensed Real Estate Agent Office", ⑤ L

B. Around June 2016, the Defendant visited D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office to request the brokerage for the purchase of the new site for delivery and delivery of E.

C. Around August 2016, the Defendant visited D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office and talked with E, the Defendant expressed to the effect that “I church is selling a church building and its site to another place.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, along with E, explained the current status, size, etc. of the Extraordinary Building and Site from G to the K Licensed Real Estate Agent Office. At the time, G stated that “The Defendant and E want to sell at the level of KRW 11 million per square.”

E. Since then, the Defendant, through P, a teaching staff member of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City N High School, expressed his intention to purchase the said building, site, etc., and directly entered into a sales contract for the said building, site, etc. (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with L, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the said building, site, etc. in the name of the Fridge on October 30, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 3-1 to 5, Eul evidence 5 and 6, witness M, G, L's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion and E, upon receiving a request from the defendant for brokerage, have an interview with the defendant several times, and have an object desired by the defendant.