beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.10 2014고정645 (1)

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a Brane car.

On March 19, 2014, around 19:50, the Defendant moved back to the road in front of the Dart, which is located in Net City C.

Since there is no distinction between different lanes, there are many parking vehicles and narrow roads, drivers have a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front, rear, and rear left, and the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and received the front wheels part of the F 124CC, which was driven by the victim E, who was parked behind the car driving by the Defendant and stopped in the rear part.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim’s arms and pressure for approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as seen above, and at the same time damaged the Defendant’s property to make an estimate of repair cost to reach KRW 840,100,00, such as the damage Oral wave.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of

However, according to the records, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant on April 9, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.