However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Defendant

A and Defendant C were working in the Victim H Co., Ltd. in Sinju, and Defendant B was working in the “K”, which is the heating contractor for the operation of the J in Sinwon-si I. L (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) is an ex post facto death with the Defendants.

On November 2014, Defendants may receive money from the Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that the management of the warehouse was improper, and there was no night employee, and Defendant A and Defendant B will take charge of the following role: (a) the truck was driving; (b) the truck was stolen from the warehouse of the said company; (c) the Defendant C was able to inform in advance of whether the said company was working at night; and (d) the Defendant C was working at night on November 8, 2014. On the other hand, the Defendants were able to receive money from the Defendant; and (c) the Defendants were able to receive money from the Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that there was no employees working at night.

Accordingly, on November 8, 2014, Defendant C informed Defendant A of the fact that there is no worker at night of the company on the day by telephone, and around 23:00 of the same day, Defendant A, Defendant C, and L parked in the vicinity of the entrance of the company at issue, and at around 23:00 of the same day L, Defendant C reported to the network within the above platform, Defendant A used a part in the above warehouse, and Defendant A used a part in the above warehouse to move the above 8th drum drum 8th of the market price of which is approximately KRW 5.8 million, which was kept in the storage of the company at issue, and turned the above drum drum 8th of the market price of the company at issue with Defendant B.

Accordingly, the defendants stolen the victim's property together with L.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written examination of suspects of L or A by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the N;

1. Statement made by the police against theO;

1. Each investigation report (with respect to the discovery of further damage and the amount of damage, the suspect J.