약정금
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) and the defendant's appeal are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant.
1. The reasoning of the appellate court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following appellate parts, and thus, citing the same in accordance with
The second "Defendant" is raised to "Defendant B" under the fifth Table of the judgment of the first instance.
The portion of "the defendant" to be 5th below the fifth judgment of the first instance shall be brought to "the defendant B".
The defendant who is "the defendant" will be "the defendant shall be jointly and severally and severally" in the judgment of the first instance.
The first half of the judgment of the first instance is "the defendant" to be "the defendant."
Following the 11th 3th th th th th th th th th of the judgment of the first instance, “(the Defendant, even if having to pay the instant contract amount to the Plaintiff via the reference document for reference on June 9, 2020, should deduct KRW 104,839,980 paid to the Plaintiff as shown in the attached Form of the judgment of the first instance, but the said money is paid in the name of the website production cost, travel expenses, etc., even if following the Defendants’ assertion.”
2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.
All appeals by the defendants are dismissed.