If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 23:41 on December 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported in front of the convenience store located in the petition-gu C, Cheongju-si; (b) and reported in front of the convenience store located in the petition-gu, 112 and sought to verify the facts, etc. against the Defendant by police officers E, and F, of the Cheongju-gu, Police Station D District Police Station, called “E” from the police officers E, with the words “I am and I am” to the police officers E, with the words “I am and I am. I am.,” and cut off the police bridge of E from 3 to 4 times, and “I am am.” to the police officers controlling this.

At the same time, the police officers assaulted police officers, such as making one-time face of police officers on drinking, together with the words “not to be able to choose to choose to impose tax on the taxable year.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the victim's face and working clothes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. An act of obstructing the execution of official duties by assaulting police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order by the defendant is considered to be unfair to the defendant, and the defendant confessions the instant crime and reflects it, and there is no criminal conviction above the suspended execution and no criminal record within the last ten years is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.