However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant was working in Busan Dongdong-gu Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in Busan Dong-gu, and tried to modify the response details in the administrative disposition inquiry under the name of the head of Busan Dong-dong Gu in order to participate in the bid of the D apartment management

1. Around May 9, 2019, the Defendant changed official document: (a) issued a certificate of performance of multi-family housing management in the name of the head of the Busan Dong-dong, and obtained a confirmation of the administrative disposition from the head of the Busan Dong-gu on September 10, 2018; and (b) then printed out the item column of the disposition details of the housing management management operator by using the computer screen program, with the following contents: (c) the Defendant changed the content of the administrative disposition to the effect that C was subject to an administrative fine of KRW 2 million on September 10, 2018.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant modified one copy of the “issuance of a certificate of management performance of multi-family housing and reply for confirmation of administrative disposition” under the name of the head of the Busan Dong-gu

2. Around May 10, 2019, the Defendant, at the Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu D apartment management office, submitted a document altered as described in paragraph (1) to an employee under the name-contested management office, who is not aware of such alteration, and exercised the document as if it were duly prepared.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with respect to E or F;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Issuance of certificates of management records of multi-family housing and response to confirmation of administrative dispositions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of the same Gu;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria (the determination of types) shall be limited to the official document crime;