When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 6, 2014, at around 14:00 on December 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the company’s office of the Defendant located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was asked questions from the Victim F (F) who is a university student working as her part-time at each weekend at the office of the Defendant’s (ju) E, who is operated by the Defendant; and (b) was her fling about the location of his wife’s office, and was given a question to the Defendant.

In the end, “the victim’s knife was knife by making the victim’s knife by hand and forced knife.”

2. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on December 13, 2014, in the office of the pertinent company, her fluort with the victim during his fluort with the victim.

“,” “sashing a sash,” “Sashs”, and “sashhines”

The phrase “buckbucks” and “bucks should be deducted,” they met in such a way that the victim’s part of the ship and the buckbucks by hand are in charge of the victim’s arms, and they committed an indecent act by force by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Entry of each part of the suspect examination protocol prepared by the prosecutor and the police concerning the accused;

1. In determining the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. supporting the facts charged, the court shall assess the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc., taking into account all the circumstances that make it difficult to record in the witness examination protocol, such as the appearance or attitude of the witness who is taking an oath in the presence of a judge, and the penology of the statement, and the penology of the witness who is making a statement in the open court after being sworn, in order to determine the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do7917, Jan. 30, 2009). If the statements made by the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall be without permission, unless there is any separate evidence to deem the credibility of the statements made by the witness as being objectively consistent with the facts charged.