2. The Defendant appears in the form of recognizing and opposing all crimes when it comes to the trial.

The defendant seems to have paid some money as interest to the victim.

However, the Defendant defrauded 84,50,000 won under the pretext of lending funds necessary for his credit business, and sent the message that impairs the honor of the victim by putting the lessee of the building that the victim manages as a lessor on the group putting the lessee of the building that he manages, and the crime is not good in light of the content of the crime and the size of the defrauded's money.

Although there is a lot of money acquired by the defendant, the defendant did not agree with the victim, and he did not recover the damage in addition to the payment of interest.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, consequence, etc. as shown in the records and pleadings, the sentence of the lower court is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to view that it is unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.