2. It is recognized that the decision-making Defendant scraped the instant car, cancelled the registration of the instant car, and provided support for the elderly and children.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment three times as a drinking driver and five times as a non-licensed driver since 2000; (b) the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving); and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the instant crime, means and consequence; and (d) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.