1. On April 18, 2015, the primary Defendant sent a door to the victim C (49 tax) at a restaurant located in Pyeongtaek-si D around Pyeongtaek-si around 17:30 on April 18, 2015 that the Defendant gamblinged.

I think, I think that the above victim suffered from the victim's right thresholds over three times per day, and suffered from the victim about two weeks of treatment, such as salt, tensions, etc.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence that the defendant suffered from the victim's right shoulders three times per e-mail and suffered from an injury to the victim, such as the victim's salt, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and there is a victim's investigative agency and court's partial statement and diagnosis.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court: (i) at the time of this case, the victim stated in this court that at the time of this case, the Defendant was exposed to 1, 2 times her head and her head, and 3 times her head was exposed to her pain; (ii) there was no big inconvenience to her head, and (iii) there was no special credit on the face before the victim was hospitalized; and (iv) the victim was abused by the Defendant at the time of this case to the extent that the hospital was actively hospitalized.

The statement is made (the name of the hospital in the written confirmation of hospitalization is indicated as the "finite, tension (finites), and other finites, finites, and other nearbys, and the functional disorder of the upper and upper times). ④ A doctor F in charge of issuing a written diagnosis of injury at the time of issuing the written diagnosis of injury was determined to be hospitalized by the victim's subjective appeal for pain, as the "finites and finite physical disorder" was the "finites of the right finites and the degree of the injury suffered by the victim". The victim is at the location of the injury to the extent that the hospitalization is necessary.