If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person engaging in freight trucking service B.

On July 24, 2016, the Defendant driven an above cargo vehicle at around 22:00, and continued to drive the front road of about 40 km from the ririth to the rithm of Sinsan-gun, Yari-gun, Yari-gun, Yari-gun.

In order to limit the height of the vehicle, the road is installed with a height restriction sign to restrict the height of the vehicle. In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by taking into account the height of the cargo vehicle in the driver of the truck.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and continuously proceed with the restriction on the height, and even if receiving the restriction on the height as the loaded goods of the above cargo vehicle, the Defendant did not take measures at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident, even though it damaged the 2,000,000 won of the repair cost, such as exchanging the sn beam of the restriction on the height of the above cargo vehicle

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the legal statement, investigation report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, evidence on the scene of a traffic accident Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts and Articles 148, 54 (1) (The amount of fine for a summary order issued, as it is, shall be determined, in consideration of the fact that the specific structure of the height restriction sign is not much serious in the state at the end of a bridge; the following day, the report to an insurance company on the completion of restoration from its original state; and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;