beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고정506

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works in the bus bus division of the Jeonju Factory Co., Ltd. and works as a representative of the same company's trade union.

1. On January 22, 2014, at around 15:56, the Defendant: (a) caused the damage and damage of property, on the ground that the Defendant did not build a scambling scam in a special tea plant at the D (ju) main plant located in the Jeonju-gun, Jeonju-gun, and without doing so; and (b) caused property damage equivalent to 820,000 won at the market price by opening a electric wire for a scambrop straw (hereinafter referred to as “L” type, length, 20cm, 4.5cm x 4.5cm x 4.5cm) on the ground that he/she did not build a scambling scam at the scambling plant in the main plant located in the Jeonju-gun, Jeonju-gun, 2014.

2. Interference with business;

A. At around 10:30 on January 18, 2014, the Defendant would not leave the place of installation of a new construction site of the EU factory EU, the Appellant company, the business agent of the Appellant company, and the construction work.

As a result of the exercise of force by “colb,” it interfered with the establishment work of the EU Speaker of the special factory EU for 8:30 minutes from that time to 20:00 on the same day.

B. At around 10:00 on January 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) exercised the power by the same method at the place of the foregoing paragraph (a); and (b) obstructed the installation work of the EU Speaker for a special factory EU for nine hours from that time to 20:00 on the same day.

C. On January 21, 2014, around 09:30 on January 21, 201, the Defendant: (a) exercised the power by the same method at the place of the foregoing paragraph; and (b) obstructed the installation work of the EU Speaker of the company that filed an accusation for one hour from that time to 10:30 on that day

D. On January 22, 2014, the Defendant exercised its power at the place of the foregoing paragraph (a) in the same manner.