A. Regarding Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gun E, the transfer of ownership was registered on July 20, 1915, when F was under circumstances on June 24, 1915, with the address in “Gri” on July 20, 1915.

B. On January 20, 1927, the land category was changed to a river, and was divided into the 7th square meters of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. on October 25, 1975, and the 821 square meters of J bank, J bank 151, and K river.

Each of the above lands becomes 23 square meters of I river, 21 square meters of L bank, and each of the real estate listed in the attached Table list of real estate (hereinafter referred to as "each of the real estate of this case") after the change of administrative district, division, etc.

C.O’s permanent domicile was born on July 21, 193 in Ulsan-gun M (which became N in Ulsan-gun after the change of administrative area) and died on P.

A child of theO is his or her father Q Q.

O was married with R, but the wife died on November 24, 1918, and the mother S died on May 30, 1920, and Q was married with T on April 25, 1916, and there was no family in the same family register at the time of the O’s death.

Q married with T (Death on September 3, 1981) and died on February 24, 1970 after Q left U, V (L on November 2, 1963), Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D (L on May 13, 1968).

V married with W (Death on January 13, 2013) and died on August 14, 1995.

The plaintiffs and U inherited Q Q as shown in the separate heir's share list.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the plaintiffs' claims, each of the real estate in this case succeeded to each of the corresponding shares listed in the separate successor list, and there is a benefit to seek confirmation of ownership.

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. (1) The Defendant’s assertion (1) Each of the instant real estate is H with the registered titleholder’s domicile in “G interest” and thus, can be identified as the registered titleholder, and the Defendant does not deny the ownership thereof. As such, the instant lawsuit is a benefit of confirmation.