퇴거불응
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant demanded a party representative interview when the D party employees refused to accept a civil petition, but rather, the Defendant was assaulted by the D party employees and reported to the police, and did not comply with the request for withdrawal by the D party employees.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was consulted with the victim at the D party office as stated in the facts charged from around 11:30 to 12:05 on September 23, 2016, and the defendant went to the first floor of the D party office and asked the victim to be informed of the name and contact details, but the victim again refused to leave the third floor, so that the victim would turn back to the third floor and go to the third floor, and did not comply with the victim's demand for withdrawal. On the same day, around 12:25, the D party executive staff reported 112, and the defendant also reported 112, while the party executive staff tried to go to go to go to the victim. After being called to the scene, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim for evacuation from the D party office, and the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave the police officer from the 130th floor of the charges, and thus, the judgment below is justified.
shall not be deemed to exist.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.