If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On February 2, 2012, the Defendant published an advertisement that purchases various smartphones on the Internet, acquired smartphones, a stolen, at low prices, from many unspecified people who had engaged in communication, and attempted to re-sale smartphones that were initialized by removing core chips.

The Defendant returned to the Seoul and the Seoul metropolitan area from March 2012 to April 2012. The Defendant purchased 25 gallonian 25 (2.50,000 won per purchase price per 105 victims, gallon 258 gallon 78 (1,50,000 won per purchase price), observersLT 8 (1,50,000 won per 1,000 won), ice 45 gramphones, 32 alphones (200,000 won per purchase price per 1,000 won), bera 4 alates (70,000 won per 1,000 won), HTS 2 1 (130,000 won) and 150,000 won (1,000 won).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police protocol on C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M,O, P, Q, R, and S;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and the choice of punishment. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.