The defendant is against the plaintiff.

On July 29, 2010, the Plaintiff assumed office as an internal director who is the Defendant’s registered officer through a resolution of the temporary general meeting of shareholders, and worked until July 28, 2013. The Plaintiff received benefits from the Defendant as listed below.

As part of the 201st 5th 7th 7th 6th 7th 8th 2010, the Defendant sent 46th 7th 8th 7th 4th 64th 7th 206th 8th 14th 206th 4th 06th 5th 06th 106th 14th 206th 14th 206th 36th 14th 2066th 14th 206th 36th 14th 207, 406th 14th 206th 3th 207, 406th 36th 14th 207, 406th 14th 206th 3th 206, 406th 36th 5th 2010.

[Reasons for recognition] Fact-finding, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul's evidence Nos. 7, 8, 14, and 16, and existence of the right to claim compensation for determination as to the cause of a claim of the whole pleadings, and Article 388 of the Commercial Act provides that remuneration for directors of a stock company shall be determined by a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders, unless the amount is determined by the articles of incorporation. Thus, the articles of incorporation, etc. provide that remuneration for directors shall