When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On August 3, 2017, the Defendant prepared the minutes of the board of directors stating that “A shall take office as the Speaker pro tempore and shall take office as the representative director,” in the minutes of the board of directors, although the facts were not held by the board of directors of the C judicial scrivener office located in the building B in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that D (hereinafter “D”) was not delegated with the authority to prepare the minutes of the board of directors by E, the Defendant shall prepare the minutes of the board of directors stating that “A shall take office as the Speaker pro tempore and the representative director shall take office for the case of the appointment of the Speaker pro tempore and the change of the representative director,” and he

By affixing the seal of E, a copy of the minutes of the board of directors under the name of E, a private document concerning rights and duties, was forged.

B. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant submitted the minutes of the board of directors in the name of forgery E to the public official in charge of being aware of the forgery at the Gi-gu District Court in the Gi-gu District Court in the 180 Gi-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gun, Gi-si, as if it were a document duly formed.

2. Around August 4, 2017, the Defendant had attended a meeting of the board of directors and deliberated on the original of a process deed, although there was no fact that the Defendant, who is a director of D in-house at the registry office of the above Jung-gu District Court, participated in the board of directors or delegated the Defendant with the authority.

The minutes of the board of directors were submitted to the public official under the name of the public official, and made the public official stated in the certified copy of the corporate registry that “F resigned on August 3, 2017 and A was appointed as the representative director.”

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false report to a public official to enter false facts in the certified copy of the corporate registry, which is the original copy of a fair deed, and around that time, exercised by having the same registry office keep a certified copy of the above corporate registry stating false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;