However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 9, 2015, the Defendant, at around Kimpo-si, around 01:0, around 00, at around 121 Dong 701 (n, 37 years of age), has a knife-car (the total length of 30cm) which is a dangerous object in the kitchen and brought about to her item with a large face-to-face with a knife (30cm).

We kept the form of the death of the inside, “I k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k kn k kn kn kn k kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and detained the victim.

The facts charged indicate that a knife 1 knife (27cm in knife, 13cm in knife) (the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

It is difficult to see it and even if it is excluded, it is recognized that the victim was detained by using a food knife, and the statement on this part is deleted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to knife photographs and photographs of victim bridges;

1. Relevant Article 278 of the Criminal Act, Articles 276 (1) and 276 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the suspended execution of sentence (the defendant is deemed not to have agreed with the victim, but there is only the fact that the defendant has been punished twice as a fine

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that even though the defendant had a dispute with the victim at the time of this crime, he did not have any fact of confinement E using the knife.

2. We examine the judgment.