대여금
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
B. The defendant
In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the Solomon Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the " Solomon Savings Bank") set the loan amount of KRW 36 months, interest rate of KRW 34% per annum, and overdue interest of KRW 44% on June 7, 2011 to the defendant. The defendant lost the benefit of time due to delinquency in paying the principal and interest, and the principal of the loan remains in KRW 986,500. Solomon Savings Bank transferred the above loan claim to the plaintiff on February 26, 2013, and notified the defendant of the assignment of the credit at that time. The plaintiff transferred the above loan claim to the plaintiff on March 18, 2015 while the trial is in progress.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as without merit, and the defendant is obligated to pay to the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff 986,500 won with 34% interest per annum from April 18, 2013 to June 21, 2013 and 44% interest per annum from the next day to the date of complete payment.
The judgment of the first instance court is unfair in conclusion, and it is so modified as above.