The Defendant had undergone a sex surgery from the victim D, who was a sexual surgery in 2006 and 2007, which was conducted by the victim D, who was a sexual surgery in 2006 and 2007, and, from around B of 2007 to A of B of 2010, the Defendant was in an internal relationship with the victim, who was the male father, and had worked as a sexual codane from the Fsung surgery in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, which was operated by the victim until July 29, 201, and G was omitted from the Defendant.

1. Suppression;

A. On June 201, the Defendant, at the above hospital around June 201, changed the victim’s house to KRW 10,000,000,000, the mother and child, who is the mother and child, to move to the victim, but refused to do so, the Defendant, “I will disclose the relationship to the public, and will close to the Internet.”

On June 24, 201, the Defendant: (a) a notary public, who is in the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 22-dong, was delivered KRW 10 million at a law firm EL office, to the Defendant, who frighted the victim and frighted to fright it.

B. On July 29, 2011, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he embezzled one million won of the surgery expenses at the above hospital on July 18, 2011, and the Defendant demanded the victim to hold a recommendation agency from the victim to leave the hospital “I wish not to leave the hospital as soon as he or she did,” and called the victim’s name, “I ambling patients who spread on the Internet that he or she did not have any relation with the hospital. I ambling the crypt by using the clicket. As the internal body surgery was erroneously performed, I would be frightly compensated.”

The Defendant, as such, was delivered KRW 15 million at the above hospital on the same day to the victim who frightened the victim and was drinking.

C. From the beginning of August 2011 to the above hospital, the Defendant sought several times from the first police officer to the above hospital, and “I will be responsible for the life of the patient, I will be able to leave the patient to the patient.” On August 20, 2011, the Defendant would be able to get out of the patient’s life with two patients who were surgeryd by the victim and to contact all patients with the victim.

It is difficult for the patients to be faced with.