A. The co-defendant I of the first instance trial and the Defendants: (a) even if recruiting employees through the Internet job placement advertisement, they did not have to pay a normal wage to their employees as it is difficult for them to raise profits; and (b) despite the absence of the intent or ability of the employees to support the user fee for the mobile phones purchased by the employees, they were allowed to purchase mobile phones, tables PCs, etc. in the name of those who reported job placement advertisements and employed them on the Internet job placement job-seeking site; and (c) accordingly, the fee was recruited for them.

B. On January 30, 2013, the above I opened a so-called "M" recruitment agency, and had Defendant J, one’s own her her son, take charge of job offer advertising as the head of the above company’s office, and let Defendant K take charge of the job offer job placement work on the Internet, and Defendant J recruited people by inserting job offer advertisements to the Internet job offering job seeking site, such as "Abacheon Country" and "Ababab", and Defendant J recruited people by inserting job offer advertisements to "in the recruitment of personnel team staff" on the Internet job offering job site, such as "Abacheon Country" and "Ababab". Defendant K provided education and management of various contracts for new employees as the team leader of the above company.

C. The above I and the Defendants found the job offer advertisement report around March 2013 to the Plaintiff A, and “M” to purchase the cell phone and bble PC in their own name in order to work in a company as an employment agency, and they concluded that they would be paid KRW 200,000 per month as communications support money to the Plaintiff A, thereby allowing the Plaintiff A to work in M and open two cell phones, and bear the job offer advertisement announcement expenses of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,0000,0000 won.

The plaintiffs' labor period, non-paid benefits and communication support expenses, and