When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 18, 2016.

Around 13:00 on January 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) even though (b) Party B escaped without taking necessary measures after causing a traffic accident while driving a rocketing and other car, the Defendant was requested by the police station to provide a traffic accident while driving the said rocketing and other car; and (c) Party B was present at the police box of the old U.S. police station located in Gumi-si on the same day at around 19:00 on the same day; and (d) Party F, who was assigned to the said police box, was carrying out a traffic accident while driving the said rocketing.

A false statement was made to the same effect, and a false statement made to the same effect.

Accordingly, the defendant got the above B to escape from committing a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the evidence record of Daejeon District Court 2017 Highest 2017 Highest 2084 and two copies of evidence;

1. Copy of a traffic accident-related statement;

1. A copy of the statement (A);

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect in the police against the defendant or G;

1. A copy of the records of trial of the first instance court of the Daejeon District Court;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witnesses with respect to G and B;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of relevant suspects' written rulings);

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report on investigation (the confirmation of recent conviction of a suspect A);

1. Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 151 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; (b) the Defendant’s false statement to an investigation agency several times to cause confusions in the investigation; and (c) the judgment of first head of the instant crime becomes final and conclusive.