2. The fact that the defendant's mistake is divided, etc. However, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act of this case constitutes a case where the defendant is punished heavily by driving under the influence of drinking at once after he/she committed more than twice a crime, and the defendant conducts drinking again on January 1, 2014 after he/she was controlled on the crime of December 6, 2013, and again conducts drinking on January 1, 2014, belongs to the fact that each blood alcohol concentration of the defendant belongs to the fact that each blood alcohol concentration of the defendant is high, and all the kinds of sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall not be deemed to be heavier than the punishment sentenced by the court below.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected that "in addition to a meeting of case agreement assistance, decision" is added at the end of 13th page of the judgment of the court below.