However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From November 3, 2015, the Defendant is a person who served as a social work personnel member in charge of B in the welfare support division at the Sungnam-si's Jung-gu Office, Sungnam-si, which is 36 days from Sungnam-gu.

The defendant on June 10, 2015, on the 18th of the same month, and the same year.

8. 19.19.16.16., June 28, 2016; the same year;

7. In total of nine days, including July 19, the same month, the 21st day of the same month, and the 22th day of the same month, the company did not work at the work without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the client by C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation, investigation report on the status of service, and explanatory note;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 89-2 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Sept. 18, 2016) (the following facts):

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;