전자금융거래법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall transfer or take over any access medium, or lend or take over any access medium in return for promising to receive any consideration.
Nevertheless, on July 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent a phone call from a person without the name of the game service provider who was a senior policeman; (b) lent the access medium to the account to acquire the cash; and (c) promised to receive KRW 3 million per access medium to the Kwikset service provider who sent the above name in front of the CPC room located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on July 13, 2016 to receive KRW 1.3 million per access medium; and (d) sent the passbook and physical card in the name of the Defendant, and notified the password by telephone.
As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. E statements;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response materials by financial institutions;
1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The crime of lending access media under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many unspecified persons, such as Bosing, etc. The access media offered by the Defendant was actually used for the crime of licensing, the Defendant appears to have been committing a crime due to economic difficulties, and the actual profit was gained from the crime.
We decide as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the fact that the circumstance is not confirmed, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and the defendant's attitude to reflect, etc.