2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant was established on April 21, 1965 and operated F elementary schools, G middle schools, and H high schools. The Defendant’s Intervenor was a person who served as the Defendant’s president from 1981 to 2013.

B. On March 2013, the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education notified the Defendant of the audit results on May 21, 2013 after conducting a specific audit on the Defendant and his/her affiliated schools. Among the contents, G middle schools were required to take measures to impose heavy disciplinary action (defluence) on the following grounds: (i) the principal of the above middle school, I of the teachers in charge of education, J of the teachers in charge of the above assistant principal of the above middle school, and K, on the ground that G middle school was engaged in unfair treatment of admission screening in 2011 to 2013; and (ii) the results were

C. However, on June 16, 2013, I voluntarily died from a school, and Plaintiff B and C, the spouse of I (hereinafter “the deceased”) inherited the Deceased.

After that, the criminal trial (Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2013Gohap198, 201, 222, 223, 224, 225 (Merger), and 226 (Merger)) against the principals and teachers, etc. of the schools affiliated with the defendant, including the defendant joining the defendant, was pending in the court of first instance. The court of first instance found the defendant guilty of "f elementary school origin from the G Middle School entrance screening and interfered with the selection of new students of the G Middle School entrance screening committee by holding in sequence the defendant joining the defendant, the deceased, the K, J, and L to pass a specific person" in relation to the crime of interference with business among the various charges on November 15, 2013, the court of first instance sentenced the defendant defendant to a suspended sentence for 4 years and 6 months in imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant joining the defendant, 1 year and 2 years in imprisonment for the case of K, 2 years in imprisonment with prison labor for the case of the defendant joining the defendant, and 2 years in suspension of execution.

(hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”: Provided, That the sentence imposed by the Defendant joining the Defendant is included in the sentence for other crimes, and the sentence imposed by the appellate court is reduced to three years and six months on the ground of the recovery of damage caused by other crimes).