beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.02 2018가단5165427

토지인도

Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant B, among the lands listed in the land list in the attached Table 1, shall be listed in the attached Form 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 444.

Reasons

1. 인정사실 원고가 주문 제1항 기재 토지 소유자인 사실, 피고 C이 그 토지 위에 별지 측량감정도 표시 ㉴, ㉵ 부분 토지를 점유하면서 ㉴ 부분 지상 무허가건물 75㎡를 소유하고 있고, 피고 B이 이를 임차하여 위 무허가건물을 점유, 사용하고 있는 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없거나 갑 2, 3호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정된다.

2. As long as the Defendants did not assert the right to possess the land owned by the Plaintiff, Defendant C is obligated to remove the said unauthorized building and deliver the land to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B is obligated to leave the building occupied by the Plaintiff.

3. Defendant C’s assertion is alleged to the effect that it cannot comply with the removal, etc. of the instant unauthorized building without any justifiable compensation, but the above Defendant cannot find any ground for seeking payment of compensation to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

4. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and thus acceptable.