2. It is true that there are favorable circumstances such as the Defendants’ joint injury to the victim F, and the Defendants’ interference with the medical services of the said victim, under which there are some circumstances to consider the motive of the instant crime, and the victim and the victim do not want punishment against the Defendants among the trials of the court below.

However, the Defendants had a record of criminal punishment several times due to each fraud or violent crime; Defendant A, even after having been sentenced to criminal punishment for fraud, committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; Defendant B, even after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the same crime due to the same crime, repeated again during the period of the suspended sentence; taking full account of the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant pleadings, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants is too unreasonable. Therefore

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.