약정금
1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
1. The reasons for this part of the basic facts are as follows. The court's reasoning is that the "Tgu North Korea Bureau" in Part 9 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as "Tgu North Korea" in Part 9 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the fact inquiry results with respect to the limited liability company specialized in the second securitization of Korean derivatives in Part 6 of the third part is the same as the part of "1. Basic Facts" in the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the fact inquiry results with respect to the limited liability company specialized in the second securitization of the second securitization, which is the Korean counterpart of the court of first instance
2. Determination on the plaintiffs' assertion such as consulting fees (the grounds for the main claim)
A. A. A summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion against Defendant D: (a) the Plaintiff Company or Plaintiff B entered into a consulting or mediation agreement with Defendant D on or around March 2013, through KK, which assist the real estate consulting and brokerage business. Accordingly, K provided Defendant D with information, such as conducting an investment analysis on the instant real estate; (b) reduced the acquisition amount due to the difference between the seller’s and the seller’s price; and (c) provided the Plaintiff with the Daegu Bank’s loan manager with contact with the Daegu Bank’s loan manager for a loan on security of some of the purchase amount to the maximum extent possible extent. Accordingly, the Plaintiff Company or Plaintiff B had the right to assist the Defendant D, who is the buyer, to receive the loan on security as much as possible without paying the purchase amount: (a) the acquisition amount of KRW 96,705,000,000, which is a brokerage fee or consulting fee pursuant to the statutory brokerage commission rate; and (b) the Plaintiff’s real estate broker’s right to receive the Plaintiff’s real estate brokerage agreement.
2) In addition to the claim for damages caused by nonperformance of the three commercial buildings sales agreement, Defendant D, after acquiring the instant real estate, entrusts the management of the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs.