If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 9, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement on the selling of gold diversization gift certificates on the Internet Rabber's Republic of Korea, and the Defendant made a false statement that he/she would send a gift certificate to the victim B who reported and contacted, and that he/she would receive a gift certificate if he/she remitted the payment to the victim B, he/she shall receive KRW 3,530,000,000 from the damaged person via the account in the name of C (Account Number D) of the Nong Bank in the name of C, KRW 70,000 won on December 9, 2016, KRW 16,700,000 won on the 19,000 won on the 16th of the same month, KRW 1050,000 on the 19,000 won

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transfer specifications and Kakalog Data;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has a record of criminal punishment for a crime of the same kind of law similar to that of the same law several times.

The amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not significant.

However, the defendant reflects the crime of this case and agreed with the victim.

In the above circumstances, the punishment shall be determined as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, including the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime.