One direction-setting (No. 1) for seized presses (p. f. f. f. f. f.) shall be confiscated.

At around 22:35 on October 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) filed a dispute with the victim D (the age of 55) who was receiving money at his/her residence located in C, and (b) demanded repayment of the amount higher than the amount lent by the victim; (c) placed the frame ( approximately 24 cm in length, about 5.5 cm in diameter) in the victim’s face; (d) put the victim into the victim’s face; (e) put about approximately two-day therapy in line with the left part of the victim’s face; and (e) inflict approximately two-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Police seizure records (voluntary submission);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Photographs of the victim's face;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The sentencing conditions under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, including the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, and the Defendant’s environment, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant's act of committing the crime of this case is recognized and reflected: The defendant can have the same force and has already been punished twice for suspension of the execution of violent crime; the crime of this case is likely to inflict bodily injury upon the victim's face; the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage; the victim did not make efforts to recover damage; and the victim wants to punish the defendant.