2. We examine the judgment, and the prosecutor's argument that the defendant committed a repeated crime during the period of repeated crime, and that there is a need for strict punishment because the defendant did not receive the victim's test.

However, in full view of the circumstances determined by the lower court and other conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the lower court’s sentencing is acceptable and it is not unreasonable for the prosecutor to assert.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.