If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is the de facto owner of the fishing vessel B (6.28 tons) and the captain of the fishing vessel who is also the de facto owner of the fishing vessel B (6.28 tons). On March 22, 2013, the Defendant issued an order to restrict the business activities of the fishing vessel on the rooftop map of the Sinsan City under the same report completion certificate and issued an order to restrict the business activities of the fishing vessel on July 27, 2013, the Defendant left the fishing vessel B (6.28 tons) of the fishing vessel at the B (6.28 tons) of the Sinsan-si B (6.28 tons) around 06:00 on the same day by operating the fishing vessel to the 09:00 square meters of the Sinsan-si, thereby refusing to issue an order to restrict the business area by operating the fishing vessel by not later than 09:00 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

Application of each police suspect examination protocol and each 14th statute to the accused at the time of detection.

1. Article 53 (2) 8 and Article 35 (1) 2 of the Act on the Management and Promotion of Fishing of Relevant Fishing for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;