If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

From around 09:30 on August 18, 2014 to early December 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s new construction work by force, such as: (a) having left only a size of 2.7m in height 2.1m that can pass through a general car to prevent the development of the village by passing through the said road; and (b) having left only a size of 2.7m in height 2.1m on the remaining roads; (c) having interfered with the traffic of the land along which a construction vehicle installed a steel fence on the road; and (d) having significantly difficulty the passage of the victim D’s construction vehicle, etc. on the ground of the victim D, a new construction work on the ground of the Cheongju-si, a considerable area of the Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A certified copy of the real estate register;

1. A contract for construction works;

1. Minutes of G community residents;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each aerial photography, photograph (before Bpents are installed), each photograph (after Bpents are installed), photograph (Evidence No. 14,20)

1. Article 185 and Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment provided for in heavier general traffic obstruction);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.