After that, the Defendant renewed a contract for two years and harvested the standard of the above forest, but the victim concluded a harvest contract, such as the standard of the above forest, with the Korea Skynae Seoul Northern Federation, which was notified on May 6, 201 that the Defendant terminated the above standard harvest contract with the victim’s agent from F during the period from May 6, 2014, the contract was lawfully terminated.

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed the human father from around September 10, 2014 to October 10 of the same year, and harvested the 23 spores equivalent to the market price of KRW 11,500,000 from the big tree planted in the above forest.

2. On August 30, 201, the main evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case lies in F’s police and legal statement, G’s police statement, and according to the above, the Defendant, the owner of D Forest land (hereinafter “the instant forest”) in Seodaemun-si around 30, 201, has the right to harvested and sell the said forest with a deposit of KRW 1 million and the harvest price of KRW 2 million, and the victim E, who is the owner of the instant forest. However, the Defendant removed “hall”, which cannot grow up for the victim, and the Defendant submitted evidence No. 1-7 (the F’s legal statement, etc.) with a business plan of evidence No. 1-1 (the document submitted by the Defendant, the instant contract of this case, based on the F’s legal statement, etc.), which is the form and transmission of evidence No. 1-1 and other harvested products, and the contract of this case, including the content of the instant contract, can be acknowledged as being written in the form of the instant contract (hereinafter referred to the instant contract).

Defendant

The defense counsel shall be the first time from the victim at the time of contract.