However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 12, 2017, around 21:05, the Defendant: (a) filed complaints in the vicinity of “C cafeteria” located in B, and (b) filed complaints to the victim D (56 tax) that the Defendant did not drive this safety; (c) made it difficult for the Defendant to use the cubs in the cubs in the manner of taking the attached materials attached to the cubs of the said vehicle in hand and hacking it into hand; and (d) thereby, destroyed the said cubs so as to have the repair cost of KRW 404,424.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (to be selected by imprisonment in consideration of the fact that there exists the same kind of power and the fact that damage has not been recovered);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (a favorable condition, such as the fact that the error is reflected);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for protection observation;