beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.12 2018고단62

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 1, 2017, at around 08:00, the Defendant: (a) took care of the victim D, who works as an employee at a place under Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s ground, and prevented the Defendant from entering the place; (b) took care of the Defendant’s entrance; and (c) took care of the Defendant’s entrance; and (d) putting the Defendant on the floor, on the part of the Defendant, she was fluoring it on the floor, on the other hand, on the ground that he was fluent and fluored as described in paragraphs (2) and (3).

Accordingly, the Defendant, by force, interfered with the business of friendship and operation of approximately 30 minutes of victims.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, and reported that the Defendant was fluoring the Defendant’s riot at the place, and that F and sloping G were shot at the Seoul Gangnam Police Station E District Station E District for Seoul, Gangnam Police Station, on the ground that she was fluoring the Defendant’s home, and that she was fluoring him/her to the victim H, who is an employee. “Ahhhhhh was fluoring the fire on the television and fluoring the fire on the television, and caused fluoring from the television by the aforesaid shock.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the fire and television of the market price which was managed by the injured party.

3. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 2, committed assaulting the head of the above F by taking advantage of the face part of the F in drinking, while she was in a situation that would be arrested as a flagrant offender by the F, while leaving the riot as described in the above F. B, he expressed the above F to the said F as “I have to go to go to her,” and used the face part of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of the order of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. A criminal investigation report (C Scelebling or CCTV images);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.

참조조문