beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.17 2015가합41391

구상금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 193,405,839 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 19, 2015 to September 17, 2015.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

(2) A (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) is a street cleaners belonging to the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City Office, Ulsan Metropolitan City, which is a workplace subject to industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

3) Nonparty B is a wing-in freight truck C (hereinafter referred to as “fwing-in freight”).

(B) The Defendant is the driver of the vehicle in question, and the Defendant is the comprehensive insurer of the vehicle in question. B) On October 15, 2009, around 06:15, the occurrence of the instant accident occurred, the two-lane road in front of the E-do located in Ulsanbuk-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., along the speed of about 55 kilometers in speed from the defensive-dong bank to the speed of 55 kilometers in speed from the defensive-dong bank. The Defendant caused the accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) caused the victim’s body part in front of the Maritime Vehicle in front of the head of the Maritime Vehicle in front of the end of the year in which the victim, who was going on the front of the Maritime Road in the same direction, was negligent in performing his duties.

2) The victim suffered serious injury in the instant accident. C. The Plaintiff’s payment of industrial accident compensation insurance benefits recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid the victim KRW 58,843,190 of temporary disability compensation benefits, and KRW 141,54,90 of the injury and disease pension, and KRW 349,868,270 of the medical care benefits (treatment costs) until August 18, 2015. D. The Defendant paid the Defendant’s partial reimbursement of KRW 13,063,560 on July 4, 2012 upon the Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement. [Grounds for recognition], the Defendant paid KRW 13,063,560 on July 4, 2012 without dispute, and evidence Nos. 1 through 12, and No. 1 (including various numbers), the purport of each of the Defendant’s liability for damages, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s right for reimbursement.

A. According to the fact that the defendant's liability for damages and the occurrence of the plaintiff's right of indemnity are recognized, the defendant as the insurer of a sea-going vehicle shall compensate the victim for the damages caused by the accident of this