(a) Business name - Public housing project (B) - Public housing project (hereinafter “instant project”): The public notice: C, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on May 26, 201, and the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on October 13, 201 - The project implementer is the Defendant:

(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on November 19, 2015 - The date of expropriation: The date of January 12, 2016 - Land subject to expropriation: The land indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiff located in the project area of this case (hereinafter “each land of this case”; each land shall be specified only by the lot number) and each obstacle owned by the Plaintiff - Compensation: The amount of KRW 4,824,417,950 of each land of this case (specific details are as indicated in the attached Table “the result of the appraisal of expropriation”), each obstacle owned by the Plaintiff, KRW 71,170,000, KRW 71,700 of each obstacle owned by the Plaintiff, the appraisal corporation: the appraisal corporation, the third appraisal corporation,

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 25, 2016 - Compensation: Each of the instant lands in question 4,886,582,730 won (specific details are as indicated in the result of the appraisal of the objection, as indicated in the attached Table “the result of the appraisal of the objection”), dismissal of an objection against each obstacles owned by the Plaintiff - An appraisal corporation: A corporation: a transfer to another appraisal corporation, the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Objection Appraisal Board”; hereinafter “the result of the appraisal of the objection”) (hereinafter “the result of the appraisal of the objection”).

D. As a result of the appraiser E’s appraisal and the result of the appraisal supplementation (hereinafter “court appraiser E”; the result of the appraisal is “court appraiser’s appraisal result”; and the result of the appraisal supplementation is “the result of the court appraisal”; and the result of the court appraisal supplementation”: The court appraisal result: F land of this case (hereinafter “F land”) KRW 4,985,302,40.

The assessment is based on the premise that only some of the areas are being used as a site. Specific details are as follows: “The result of the court appraisal” in the attached Table - Results of the court appraisal supplementation: 1,730,145,200 won (assessment based on the premise that the whole land in dispute is being used as a site) of the land in question / [a ground for recognition] without dispute, A Nos. 1, 2, and 1 through 2.