2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 3, 2014, the Plaintiff, while under the influence of alcohol on May 17:3, 2017:30, driven a BKan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k

As a result of the respiratory measurement conducted by the Seoul Gangseo Police Station around 18:42 on the same day, the Plaintiff’s blood alcohol concentration was measured at 0.080%.

나. 피고는, 위 호흡측정치에 위드마크공식을 적용하여 원고의 음주운전시점에서의 혈중알코올농도를 0.089%(≒음주측정수치 0.080%＋시간당 알코올분해량 0.008%×72분/60분)로 추산하고, 2014. 6. 11. 원고에 대하여 위와 같은 음주운전으로 인적 피해 교통사고를 유발하였음을 이유로 도로교통법 제93조 제1항 제1호에 따라 원고의 제1종 보통, 제2종 보통, 제2종 원동기장치자전거 운전면허(면허번호 : I)를 취소하는 처분을 하였다

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on July 22, 2014, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the appeal on August 19, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Class A 1, Nos. 2, Eul Nos. 1 through 4, and 6 through 13

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the direct cause of the traffic accident of this case is recognized by the plaintiff's drinking or that of judgment.