Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted all of the facts charged of the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In contrast to logical and empirical rules, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, by violating the principle of court-oriented and substantial direct deliberation, by misapprehending the principle of clarity in the crime, or by misapprehending the legal principles on indecent acts committed in violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.