When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in a name in a name in the Gbaling Chapter B, stating that “on the face of lending an account, the account is needed to reduce and exempt taxes from liquor companies, such as studal,” and (b) received a proposal that “on the face of lending an account, the Defendant would give KRW 3 million per account.” (c) A physical card connected to the national bank account (D) in the name in the name of the Defendant, and sent the account to the person in a name in question

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for, lent the means of access for electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a warrant of search, seizure and verification (investigative record 31 pages);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts, Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, the selection of fines (excluding a long-term suspended sentence for a long time) concerning the selection of criminal facts, and the selection of fines (the punishment prescribed by a summary order shall be reduced, in consideration of the circumstances of crimes, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;