도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 04:55 on April 28, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a B-to-purd vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.121% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license in the 20km section of approximately 20km from the front day of a frightd fright in the erode of the local-ero-ero-ero-ero-ero-ero-ero, the head of the Defendant.
2. A defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be a holder of a B-to-purd passenger vehicle, and an automobile not covered by mandatory insurance shall not be operated on the road;
Nevertheless, at around 04:55 on April 28, 2012, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance from the front day of the offline frown-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the front day of the offline frown-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.
3. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a B-to-purd vehicle.
Around 04:55 on April 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, as set forth in paragraph (1), and driven the three-lane road of the distance of the preferred market at the corner of the valley at the time of Suwon, along two-lanes from the court from the evis-dong Underground Road to the court, at a speed of about 30km.
At that time, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as securing safety distance to avoid the stop of the Poter cargo vehicle, inasmuch as the Defendant had followed the Dpoter cargo vehicle driven by the victim C prior to the same direction. Therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as ensuring safety distance to avoid the stop of the Poter vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant is found to be late to stop the vehicle due to the vehicle stop signal in the front bank when the defendant neglected to do so due to negligence while neglecting the front line.