beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.02.19 2015나4926

가옥명도 등

Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the explanation of this case by the party member of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The period of possession after May 16, 2015” under Section 14 of Chapter 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as “the period of possession after May 16, 2015, the Plaintiff”; “The Plaintiff shall be deemed as “the period of possession after May 16, 2013,” and the evidence No. 16, 18, and 19 submitted at the court of first instance and the testimony of the witness G of the party in the trial are insufficient to recognize the formation of each authenticity of the evidence No. 13, No. 14 of the agreement, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the agreement as described in the above agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and there is no possibility that the Plaintiff’s seal No. 14-1 of the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance may be different from the aforementioned evidence No. 20, and evidence No. 15. 815.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's counterclaim claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining counterclaim claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition.